Are there any exceptions for news organizations under Twitter's manipulated media policy?

Under Twitter's manipulated media policy, news organizations are not exempt from the rules governing manipulated media. However, there are considerations and practices that might affect how manipulated media from news organizations is handled:

### **1. Contextual Evaluation**

- **Journalistic Intent**: Twitter assesses the context and intent behind the use of manipulated media by news organizations. If the media is part of an investigative report or analysis that clearly indicates its manipulated nature and provides context, it might be treated differently than content designed to mislead.

- **Editorial Standards**: News organizations often follow established editorial standards and practices. Content that is flagged as manipulated but is presented with clear editorial intent and context might be subject to review with these standards in mind.

### **2. Labeling and Warnings**

- **Transparency Labels**: Manipulated media shared by news organizations may receive transparency labels to indicate that the media has been altered. This helps maintain transparency while providing context about the media's nature.

- **Contextual Information**: Twitter might include additional context or explanations to clarify why the media was manipulated and how it fits into the news organization's reporting or analysis.

### **3. Visibility and Reach**

- **Reduced Visibility**: Manipulated media from news organizations might face restrictions on visibility, such as reduced prominence in search results or timelines, especially if there is a risk of it misleading viewers.

- **Educational Focus**: If the media is used to educate or provide analysis about media manipulation, it might be treated with a focus on ensuring that the educational intent is clear to users.

### **4. Reporting and Appeals**

- **User Reporting**: Manipulated media from news organizations can be reported by users if it is perceived as misleading or harmful. Twitter reviews these reports while considering the context and purpose of the content.

- **Appeals Process**: News organizations can appeal decisions if their content is flagged or restricted. The appeals process allows for re-evaluation of the content's context and intent, taking into account journalistic practices and objectives.

### **5. Policy Guidelines**

- **Adherence to Policies**: News organizations are expected to adhere to Twitter's policies on manipulated media, which include rules against misleading content and requirements for transparency.

- **Special Considerations**: While there are no formal exceptions, Twitter may take into account the role of news organizations in providing context and analysis when making moderation decisions.

### **6. Collaboration and Support**

- **Partnerships with News Organizations**: Twitter may collaborate with news organizations to address issues related to manipulated media and misinformation, aiming to support accurate journalism while managing content effectively.

- **Training and Resources**: Twitter provides resources and training to both content creators and moderators to better handle manipulated media, including content from news organizations.

Overall, while news organizations are subject to Twitter's policies on manipulated media, their role in journalism and reporting may influence how their content is reviewed and moderated. Twitter's goal is to ensure that manipulated media is managed in a way that maintains the integrity of information while supporting responsible journalism.